Post Panda Dissatisfaction at Google Webmaster forum
Dissatisfied with Google Webmaste Forum Reply ? – You may like to join and post at the forum – for a more impartial review and suggestion of your site.
If you are a webmaster and your site is hurt by Google Panda, you probably have visited the Crawling, Indexing and Ranking section of the Google Webmaster Forum.
There has been an spurt of activity on this forum as a large number of webmasters who are hit by google Panda post their plight for a possible remedy. A special post has been created to report that sites that have been hit by google panda.
The forum was supposed to help the webmasters in figuring out what is wrong with their websites, so that they could attempt to make changes. A quick look at the websites posted suggests that the websites deserved the drop in the ranking that is being seen. And when the Top Contributors ( TCs, as is more popularly known) point this to the webmasters, it only adds to the anger of the webmasters who are willing to do anything to get out of the clutches of google panda.
The recovery from the google panda is a rare phenomenon. As one of the posters on the forums asks
“After doling out advices to tens of thousands of websites, show me a list of 10 websites that have recovered from Google Panda.”
Recovery from Google Panda seems to be non existence. Cult of MAC was supposed to be one of the first websites that recovered from google Panda, but, when, suspicion was pointed out, Matt Cutts clarified that the site was not hit by Panda on first place.
Labnol.org is one of the earliest websites that recovered from Panda. However, its recovery is being seen with suspicion, as, its recovery did not align with the dates of the Panda releases.
The biggest concern that webmasters have at the forum is that, the content copied from their websites are being outranked. If a website writes an original content and its content is copied to a high authority website, its content is easily outranked. The top contributors at the forum maintain that, the contents are not original on its first place, as these too are copied from some places. This has let to bitter altercation between the top contributors and the forum posters.
Related posts: